Beyond the Monograph: A Quality Assurance Framework for PhD by Publication and PhD by Published Work in African Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65655/ocp.ojtell.181Keywords:
cross-border doctoral education, PhD by publication, PhD by published work, quality assurance, doctoral equivalence, African higher education, research integrityAbstract
Publication-based doctoral formats are expanding internationally, but their terminology, eligibility, authorship, synthesis and examination rules remain heterogeneous. This creates a governance problem for African systems seeking to expand doctoral capacity without weakening the doctorate. Through comparative analysis of 11 current regulatory and institutional sources and a bounded scholarly evidence map of 30 core records from 43 unique screened records, this study develops an evidence-informed quality-assurance architecture for PhD by Publication and PhD by Published Work. The evidence-map flow uses PRISMA-ScR-informed reporting without claiming an exhaustive database scoping review. Cross-case analysis identifies four models: prospective publication-based doctorates, retrospective published-work doctorates, publication-inclusive hybrid theses, and higher doctorates by works. Across procedural variation, credible systems converge on original contribution, coherent synthesis, auditable candidate contribution, research integrity, researcher formation and independent whole-portfolio examination. The article therefore advances equivalence without uniformity and proposes the African Publication-Based Doctoral Quality Assurance Framework (APD-QAF), organised around four gates: pathway legitimacy and eligibility, portfolio integrity and candidate ownership, integrative scholarship and researcher formation, and independent equivalent examination. The framework separates invariant doctoral outcomes from context-sensitive implementation. For African regulators and universities, including Rwanda as its postgraduate research framework develops, publication counts, journal status and prior peer review cannot substitute for evidence of an integrated, original and independently examinable doctoral contribution.
References
Adesemowo, A. K. (2023). IDADA: Towards a multimethod methodological framework for PhD by publication underpinned by critical realism. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 979. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02498-w
Agolla, J. E., & Seeletso, M. K. (2025). Towards a holistic doctoral supervision in Africa: An input-output approach. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 20, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.28945/5468
Albertyn, R. (2025). Issues of authorship threatening research integrity: Pointers for ethical publication practices. South African Journal of Higher Education, 39(5), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.20853/39-5-6611
Asongu, S. A., & Nwachukwu, J. C. (2018). PhD by publication as an argument for innovation and technology transfer: With emphasis on Africa. Higher Education Quarterly, 72(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12141
Badley, G. (2009). Publish and be doctor-rated: The PhD by published work. Quality Assurance in Education, 17(4), 331-342. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880910992313
Botha, J., Frick, L., & Tshuma, N. (Eds.). (2025). Doctoral education in context: Perspectives from Africa. African Minds. https://doi.org/10.47622/9781067253530
Byrne, J. A., Abalkina, A., Akinduro-Aje, O., Christopher, J., Eaton, S. E., Joshi, N., Scheffler, U., Wise, N. H., & Wright, J. (2024). A call for research to address the threat of paper mills. PLOS Biology, 22(11), e3002931. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002931
Cardenuto, J. P., Moreira, D., & Rocha, A. (2024). Unveiling scientific articles from paper mills with provenance analysis. PLOS ONE, 19(10), e0312666. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312666
Frick, L. (2016). PhD by publication: An institutional analysis. In C. Fourie-Malherbe, R. Albertyn, C. Aitchison, & E. Bitzer (Eds.), Postgraduate supervision: Future foci for the knowledge society (pp. 299-312). SUN Press. https://doi.org/10.18820/9781928357223/18
Helgesson, G., Holm, S., Bredahl, L., Hofmann, B., & Juth, N. (2023). Misuse of co-authorship in medical PhD theses in Scandinavia: A questionnaire survey. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21(3), 393-406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-022-09465-1
Hoomanfard, M. H., & Shamsi, Y. (2025). Generative AI in dissertation writing: L2 doctoral students' self-reported use, AI-giarism, and perceived training needs. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 78, 101570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101570
Kobayashi, S., & Emmeche, C. (2023). What makes a good PhD thesis? Norms of science as reflected in written assessments of PhD theses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(8), 1310-1324. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2200917
Krasnican, V., Gaizauskaite, I., Bulow, W., Dlabolova, D. H., & Bjelobaba, S. (2024). Transition from academic integrity to research integrity: The use of checklists in the supervision of master and doctoral students. Journal of Academic Ethics, 22(1), 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-023-09498-0
Luneta, K., Golding, J., Kapenda, H. M., & Phiri Nalube, P. (Eds.). (2023). Doctoral supervision in Southern Africa: From theory to practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46899-5
Mason, S., Frick, L., Castello, M., Cheng, W., Chong, S.-W., Diaz Villalba, L., Garcia-Morante, M., Kong, M. S., Sakurai, Y., Shojaeian, N., Spronken-Smith, R., & Weise, C. (2025a). Prominence, promotion and positioning of the 'Thesis by Publication' in six countries. Higher Education Policy, 38, 472-492. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-024-00350-7
Mason, S., Frick, L., Castello, M., Cheng, W., Chong, S.-W., Diaz Villalba, L., Garcia-Morante, M., Kong, M. S., Sakurai, Y., Spronken-Smith, R., & Weise, C. (2025b). What makes a Thesis by Publication? An international study of policy requirements and restrictions. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 47(1), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2024.2389357
Mason, S., Morris, J. E., & Merga, M. K. (2021). Institutional and supervisory support for the Thesis by Publication. Australian Journal of Education, 65(1), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944120929065
Mason, S., & Solli, K. (2025). 'A thesis is a thesis'? Insights into how researchers examine doctoral theses that include publications. Issues in Educational Research, 35(1), 237-254. https://www.iier.org.au/iier35/mason.pdf
McKenna, S., Ashwin, P., Negra, D., Onyango, P., Paretti, M. C., & Teelken, C. (2025). Redesigning doctoral education in South Africa: The case for structured coursework. Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning, 13(2), 201-219. https://doi.org/10.14426/cristal.v13i2.2895
Merga, M. K. (2025). PhD thesis by publication in social science research: A practical guide. Facet Publishing.
Nethsinghe, R., & Southcott, J. (2015). A juggling act: Supervisor/candidate partnership in a doctoral thesis by publication. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 167-185. https://doi.org/10.28945/2256
Ogada, T. P. M., Ouko, K. O., Lutomiah, A., Odongo, N., Magale, E., Mbaya, C., Omwoyo, E., Mideva, C., Onyango, J., Oyugi, S., Orang'o, C. K., Nyagah, B., & Nguku, E. (2026). Institutional socioeconomic psychosocial and policy determinants of doctoral enrolment retention and completion in Kenya, Ethiopia, and Rwanda. Discover Education, 5, 823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-01973-1
Ogunlana, M. O., & Govender, P. (2025). Challenges of doctoral education in Nigeria: A qualitative exploratory study. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2477375. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2477375
Omoya, O., Jacob, U. S., Odeyemi, O. A., & Odeyemi, O. A. (2025). Exploring perspectives: A scoping review of the challenges facing doctoral training in Africa. Higher Education, 89, 1103-1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01264-4
Ou, A. W., Khuder, B., Franzetti, S., & Negretti, R. (2024). Conceptualising and cultivating Critical GAI Literacy in doctoral academic writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 66, 101156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101156
Parker, L., Boughton, S., Bero, L., & Byrne, J. A. (2024). Paper mill challenges: Past, present, and future. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 176, 111549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111549
Peacock, S. (2017). The PhD by publication. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 123-135. https://doi.org/10.28945/3781
Pratiwi, H. (2025). Between shortcut and ethics: Navigating the use of artificial intelligence in academic writing among Indonesian doctoral students. European Journal of Education, 60, e70083. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70083
Robins, L., & Kanowski, P. (2008). PhD by publication: A student's perspective. Journal of Research Practice, 4(2), M3. https://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/136
Sammon, D., Nagle, T., McAvoy, J., Heavin, C., Fitzgerald, C., McCarthy, S., Wibisono, A., & Alhassan, I. (2024). Exploring the PhD supervisor/candidate relationship for a 'publication-based thesis': A metaphor-driven approach. Journal of Decision Systems, 33(sup1), 118-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2024.2363036
Scherer, C., & Sooryamoorthy, R. (Eds.). (2022). Doctoral training and higher education in Africa. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003183952
Schachtebeck, C. (2025). Article-based thesis or thesis by monograph? Supervisors' views on the route to completion of doctoral studies. International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy, 7(1), 222-228. https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v7i1.672
Sharmini, S., Spronken-Smith, R., Golding, C., & Harland, T. (2015). Assessing the doctoral thesis when it includes published work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(1), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.888535
Shamsi, A. F., & Osam, U. V. (2022). Challenges and support in article publication: Perspectives of non-native English speaking doctoral students in a 'publish or no degree' context. SAGE Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221095021
Solli, K., & Nygaard, L. P. (2023). The doctorate in pieces: A scoping review of research on the PhD thesis by publication. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(4), 984-999. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2110575
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., . . . Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467-473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
van Schalkwyk, S., Mouton, J., Redelinghuys, H., & McKenna, S. (2020). A systematic analysis of doctoral publication trends in South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 116(7/8), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2020/7926
Wu, C., Moorhouse, B. L., Wan, Y., & Wu, M. (2026). Exploring PhD students' utilization of generative AI in academic writing for publication purposes: Insights for EAP. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 79, 101612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101612
Yusuf, A., Pervin, N., & Roman-Gonzalez, M. (2024). Generative AI and the future of higher education: A threat to academic integrity or reformation? Evidence from multicultural perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00453-6
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sixbert SANGWA (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
