Disciplined Discernment and Stigmatized Knowledge: A Christian Social Epistemology of Conspiracy Labels, Institutional Trust, and Knowledge Control
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65655/OpenChristianPress.2026.110Keywords:
Christian social epistemology, stigmatized knowledge, conspiracy theory, suppressed discourse, epistemic injustice, institutional trust, biblical discernmentAbstract
Background: In contemporary information environments, labels such as “conspiracy theory,” “misinformation,” and “extremism” increasingly shape whether contested claims receive evidentiary evaluation or are excluded before inquiry begins. Yet Christian responses often oscillate between institutional naivety, which equates authorized narratives with truth, and conspiratorial credulity, which treats suppression as proof. Aim: This article develops a Christian social epistemology for evaluating stigmatized, suppressed, and institutionally discredited knowledge claims with courage, restraint, and fidelity to biblical truth. Method: Using a secondary-data conceptual design, the study integrates social epistemology, sociology of knowledge, epistemic injustice, conspiracy theory studies, propaganda and misinformation research, critical realism, and biblical theology. It does not adjudicate any specific controversial claim. Instead, it constructs a normative framework for responsible inquiry. Findings: The article argues that “conspiracy theory” functions not only as an epistemic category but also as a social and institutional label that can discipline discourse, protect legitimate standards, or prematurely foreclose investigation. It proposes a ten-level layered discernment model moving from empirical observation, epistemic classification, institutional mechanism, historical genealogy, discursive framing, power analysis, rival explanations, and disconfirmation testing to biblical-theological discernment and ethical response. The framework distinguishes verified evidence, documented patterns, plausible inference, contested interpretation, and theological discernment. Contribution: The article contributes to theology, social epistemology, and public discourse by offering an academically rigorous and biblically governed alternative to both uncritical institutional trust and reckless suspicion. It contends that Christian scholars, churches, and public intellectuals must test contested claims through evidence, humility, methodological transparency, and moral accountability, refusing both fear-driven speculation and passive conformity to managed narratives.
References
Bale, J. M. (2007). Political paranoia v. political realism: On distinguishing between bogus conspiracy theories and genuine conspiratorial politics. Patterns of Prejudice, 41(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313220601118751
Barkun, M. (2013). A culture of conspiracy: Apocalyptic visions in contemporary America (2nd ed.). University of California Press. https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520276826/a-culture-of-conspiracy
Barkun, M. (2015). Conspiracy theories as stigmatized knowledge. Diogenes, 62(3-4), 114-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0392192116669288
Bavinck, H. (2003). Reformed dogmatics: Vol. 1. Prolegomena (J. Vriend, Trans.; J. Bolt, Ed.). Baker Academic. (Original work published 1895) https://bakeracademic.com/p/reformed-dogmatics-volume-1-herman-bavinck/342306
Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190923624.001.0001
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/12390/the-social-construction-of-reality-by-peter-l-berger/
Bernays, E. L. (1928). Propaganda. Horace Liveright. https://archive.org/details/propaganda00bern_0
Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science. Routledge. (Original work published 1975) https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203090732
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001
Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225
Bucher, T. (2018). If...then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190493028.001.0001
Carson, D. A. (1996). The gagging of God: Christianity confronts pluralism. Zondervan. https://zondervanacademic.com/products/the-gagging-of-god
Cassam, Q. (2019). Conspiracy theories. Polity Press. https://www.politybooks.com/bookdetail?book_slug=conspiracy-theories--9781509535835
Christian Standard Bible. (2020). Holman Bible Publishers. https://www.biblegateway.com/versions/Christian-Standard-Bible-CSB/
Coady, D. (Ed.). (2006). Conspiracy theories: The philosophical debate. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315259574
Dentith, M. R. X. (2014). The philosophy of conspiracy theories. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137363169
Dotson, K. (2011). Tracking epistemic violence, tracking practices of silencing. Hypatia, 26(2), 236–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01177.x
Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 40(S1), 3-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568
Ellul, J. (1965). Propaganda: The formation of men's attitudes (K. Kellen & J. Lerner, Trans.). Alfred A. Knopf. https://archive.org/details/propagandaformat0000ellu
Fenster, M. (2008). Conspiracy theories: Secrecy and power in American culture (Rev. ed.). University of Minnesota Press. https://www.upress.umn.edu/9780816654949/conspiracy-theories/
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.; C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham, & K. Soper, Trans.). Pantheon Books. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/25184/powerknowledge-by-michel-foucault/
Frame, J. M. (1987). The doctrine of the knowledge of God. P&R Publishing. https://www.prpbooks.com/book/doctrine-of-the-knowledge-of-god
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/9780300235029/custodians-of-the-internet/
Goldman, A. I. (1999). Knowledge in a social world. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198238207.001.0001
Gorwa, R., Binns, R., & Katzenbach, C. (2020). Algorithmic content moderation: Technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance. Big Data & Society, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719897945
Graves, L. (2016). Deciding what’s true: The rise of political fact-checking in American journalism. Columbia University Press. https://cup.columbia.edu/book/deciding-whats-true/9780231175067/
Guess, A. M., Lerner, M., Lyons, B., Montgomery, J. M., Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., & Sircar, N. (2020). A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(27), 15536–15545. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920498117
Harambam, J., & Aupers, S. (2015). Contesting epistemic authority: Conspiracy theories on the boundaries of science. Public Understanding of Science, 24(4), 466-480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514559891
Hardwig, J. (1991). The role of trust in knowledge. The Journal of Philosophy, 88(12), 693-708. https://doi.org/10.2307/2027007
Hawley, K. (2012). Trust: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199697342.001.0001
Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Pantheon Books. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/69141/manufacturing-consent-by-edward-s-herman-and-noam-chomsky/
Hofstadter, R. (1964, November). The paranoid style in American politics. Harper's Magazine, 229(1374), 77-86. https://harpers.org/archive/1964/11/the-paranoid-style-in-american-politics/
Husting, G., & Orr, M. (2007). Dangerous machinery: "Conspiracy theorist" as a transpersonal strategy of exclusion. Symbolic Interaction, 30(2), 127-150. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2007.30.2.127
Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
Keeley, B. L. (1999). Of conspiracy theories. The Journal of Philosophy, 96(3), 109-126. https://doi.org/10.2307/2564659
Knight, P. (2000). Conspiracy culture: From Kennedy to The X-Files. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Conspiracy-Culture-From-Kennedy-to-The-X-Files/Knight-Knight/p/book/9780415189781
Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., Schudson, M., Sloman, S. A., Sunstein, C. R., Thorson, E. A., Watts, D. J., & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094-1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
Lewandowsky, S., & Cook, J. (2020). The conspiracy theory handbook. George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication. https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/conspiracy-theory-handbook/
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the "post-truth" era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106-131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018
Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. Harcourt, Brace and Company. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/6456
Medina, J. (2013). The epistemology of resistance: Gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and the social imagination. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199929023.001.0001
Muirhead, R., & Rosenblum, N. L. (2019). A lot of people are saying: The new conspiracism and the assault on democracy. Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691188836/a-lot-of-people-are-saying
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019). Reproducibility and replicability in science. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303
Newbigin, L. (1989). The gospel in a pluralist society. Eerdmans. https://www.eerdmans.com/9780802804266/the-gospel-in-a-pluralist-society/
Nguyen, C. T. (2020). Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles. Episteme, 17(2), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2018.32
O'Donovan, O. (1996). The desire of the nations: Rediscovering the roots of political theology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598234
OECD. (2024). Facts not fakes: Tackling disinformation, strengthening information integrity. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/d909ff7a-en
Oreskes, N. (2019). Why trust science? Princeton University Press. https://histsci.fas.harvard.edu/publications/why-trust-science
Pigden, C. (1995). Popper revisited, or what is wrong with conspiracy theories? Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 25(1), 3-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839319502500101
Plantinga, A. (2000). Warranted Christian belief. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195131932.001.0001
Roberts, S. T. (2019). Behind the screen: Content moderation in the shadows of social media. Yale University Press. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300261479/behind-the-screen/
Sangwa, S. (2025b). Global digital identity systems: Interdisciplinary insights into surveillance, governance, and prophetic implications. Open Journal of Science, Philosophy & Theology, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.65655/v186sm55
Sangwa, S. (2025c). Occult strategies of spirit-contact in modern practice: Diffusion and discernment. Open Journal of Stigmatized Knowledge & Suppressed Discourses, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.65655/h8cn0p49
Sangwa, S. (2025d). Secret and quasi-secret societies: History, influence, and theological perspective. Open Journal of Stigmatized Knowledge & Suppressed Discourses, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.65655/ktq9ph81
Sangwa, S. (2025e). Secret societies, central banking, digital surveillance and the Great Reset: The serpentine strategy and biblical prophecy. Open Journal of Stigmatized Knowledge & Suppressed Discourses, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.65655/pe2j7b54
Sangwa, S. (2025f). The silence of the saints: Why the church no longer speaks against the powers of the age. Open Journal of Science, Philosophy & Theology, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17597255
Sangwa, S. (2026a). From digital cooperation to coordinated governance: A critical interdisciplinary analysis of centralization in the United Nations’ Pact for the Future and Global Digital Compact. Open Journal of AI, Ethics & Society, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.65655/OpenChristianPress.2026.97
Sangwa, S. (2026b). New Age spirituality: Origins, beliefs, practices, symbols, and biblical discernment. Open Journal of Science, Philosophy & Theology, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.65655/OCP.0076
Sangwa, S. (2026c). The stages of World War III as narrative policy: Computational mapping of conspiracy discourse and biblical prophecy. Open Journal of Stigmatized Knowledge & Suppressed Discourses, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.65655/ynayd346
Sangwa, S., & Mutabazi, P. (2025a). Artificial intelligence ethics and biblical prophecy: A global Christian analysis of algorithmic censorship, digital deception, and eschatological risk. Open Journal of Business Theology, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.65655/6hrx1r41
Sangwa, S., & Mutabazi, P. (2025b). Lucifer’s operating system: Exposing the spiritual code of global governance. Open Journal of Business Theology, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.65655/c0wn6t51
Sangwa, S., & Mutabazi, P. (2025c). Misinformation laws and free speech: Biblical theology and constitutional principles for global social media governance. Open Journal of Business Theology, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.65655/0nwajh64
Sangwa, S., & Mutabazi, P. (2025d). Programmable CBDCs, digital identity, ISO 20022, and AI: Reconfiguring power in payment infrastructures. Open Journal of Stewardship Economics & Ethical Innovation, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.65655/p0w2r666
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language, 25(4), 359–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x
Stanley, J. (2015). How propaganda works. Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691173429/how-propaganda-works
Star, S. L. (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027649921955326
Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A. (2009). Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(2), 202-227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.x
UNESCO. (2023). Guidelines for the governance of digital platforms: Safeguarding freedom of expression and access to information through a multi-stakeholder approach. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/guidelines-governance-digital-platforms
United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression, Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Representative on Freedom of the Media, Organization of American States Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression, & African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information. (2017). Joint declaration on freedom of expression and “fake news”, disinformation and propaganda. OSCE. https://www.osce.org/fom/302796
Uscinski, J. E., & Parent, J. M. (2014). American conspiracy theories. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199351800.001.0001
Vanhoozer, K. J. (1998). Is there a meaning in this text? The Bible, the reader, and the morality of literary knowledge. Zondervan. https://zondervanacademic.com/products/is-there-a-meaning-in-this-text
Vanhoozer, K. J. (2005). The drama of doctrine: A canonical-linguistic approach to Christian theology. Westminster John Knox Press. https://www.wjkbooks.com/Products/0664223273/the-drama-of-doctrine.aspx
van Prooijen, J.-W., & Douglas, K. M. (2017). Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies, 10(3), 323-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017701615
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe. https://edoc.coe.int/en/media/7495-information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-research-and-policy-making.html
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sixbert SANGWA, Placide Mutabazi, Jean Bosco Muvunyi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
