Eschatological Anxiety and Algorithmic Conspirituality: A Scripture-First Critique of Digital End-Time Narratives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65655/OpenChristianPress.2026.116Keywords:
eschatology, digital religion, algorithmic conspirituality, conspiracy narratives, stigmatized knowledge, geopolitics, discernment, misinformation, Scripture-first theologyAbstract
This article develops a Scripture-first theological critique of contemporary digital end-time narratives emerging at the intersection of geopolitical upheaval, platformized anxiety, and stigmatized knowledge. It argues that war, displacement, surveillance, institutional distrust, synthetic media, and informational disorder create understandable conditions for eschatological concern, but they do not justify the conversion of conjecture into prophecy or the elevation of self-sealing narrative systems into authoritative Christian teaching. Methodologically, the article offers an interdisciplinary conceptual analysis that brings biblical hermeneutics into conversation with scholarship on digital religion, conspiracy belief, conspirituality, algorithmic personalization, and public reports on geopolitical and informational risk. Its central contribution is a Scripture-first evaluative typology that distinguishes verified fact, plausible interpretation, and unsupported speculation. The article then identifies recurring doctrinal and hermeneutical distortions in online end-time discourse, including headline exegesis, date-setting, Gnostic epistemic elitism, algorithmic providentialism, totalized conspiracy, and the pastoral deformation of Christian hope into perpetual crisis scanning. The argument does not dismiss every extra-institutional concern as irrational, nor does it baptize every suspicious pattern as prophetic certainty. Instead, it contends that Christian watchfulness must remain disciplined by Scripture, proportionate evidence, theological humility, and pastoral responsibility. A biblically responsible eschatology is sober rather than sensational, discerning rather than paranoid, and strengthening rather than fear-amplifying. It teaches believers to test claims, resist false certainty, endure suffering, speak truthfully, and center hope in the appearing of Christ rather than in speculative mastery over every geopolitical convulsion or viral digital sign.
References
Barkun, M. (2015). Conspiracy theories as stigmatized knowledge. Diogenes, 62(3-4), 114-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0392192116669288
Bauckham, R. (1993). The theology of the Book of Revelation. Cambridge University Press. dn710800.ca.archive.org/0/items/ChristianE-booksIi/TheTheologyOfTheBookOfRevelation-RichardBauckham.pdf
Beale, G. K. (1999). The Book of Revelation: A commentary on the Greek text. Eerdmans. https://dokumen.pub/the-book-of-revelation-a-commentary-on-the-greek-text-080282174x-0833648514.html
Campbell, H. A. (Ed.). (2013). Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds. Routledge. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Heidi-Campbell-8/publication/293958274_Digital_Religion_Understanding_Religious_Practice_in_New_Media_Worlds/links/56bcfa8408ae5e7ba40fbdf0/Digital-Religion-Understanding-Religious-Practice-in-New-Media-Worlds.pdf
Campbell, H. A., & Evolvi, G. (2020). Contextualizing current digital religion research on emerging technologies. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.149
Collins, J. J. (1998). The apocalyptic imagination: An introduction to Jewish apocalyptic literature (2nd ed.). Eerdmans. https://www.amazon.com/Apocalyptic-Imagination-Introduction-Literature-Biblical/dp/0802843719
Cotter, K., Ritchart, A., De, A., Foyle, K., Kanthawala, S., McAtee, H., & Watson, T. X. (2024). If you're reading this, it's meant for you: The reflexive ambivalence of algorithmic conspirituality. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 30(6), 1897-1915. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565241258949
Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 538-542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261
Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 40(S1), 3-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568
Foertsch, S., Chakraborty, R., & Joosse, P. (2024). Asymmetric conflation: QAnon and the political cooptation of religion. Politics and Religion, 17(1), 58-80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048323000275
Freedom House. (2025). Freedom on the Net 2025: An uncertain future for the global internet. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/2025/uncertain-future-global-internet
Grusauskaite, K., Harambam, J., & Aupers, S. (2025). Reactionary exiles: How conspiracy theorists deal with socio-technological exclusion. Cultural Sociology, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/17499755241248726
Henao, L. A. (2025, September 23). A doomsday prediction about the Rapture is spreading on TikTok. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/rapture-end-times-evangelical-christians-tiktok-e7d065520186503a6223ee12df1f02dd
Hjarvard, S. (2011). The mediatisation of religion: Theorising religion, media and social change. Culture and Religion, 12(2), 119-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/14755610.2011.579719
Kanthawala, S., Cotter, K., Ritchart, A., De, A., McAtee, H., Yun, C., & DeCook, J. (2025). Algorithmic conspirituality: Explicating its emergence, dimensions, and persuasibility. New Media & Society, 27(5), 2885-2910. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231217425
Koester, C. R. (2014). Revelation: A new translation with introduction and commentary. Yale University Press. https://www.amazon.com/Revelation-Translation-Introduction-Commentary-Commentaries/dp/0300216912
Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. (2025, June 17). How the public checks information it thinks might be wrong. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2025/how-public-checks-information-it-thinks-might-be-wrong
Sangwa, S. (2025). Secret societies, central banking, digital surveillance and the Great Reset: The serpentine strategy and biblical prophecy. Open Journal of Stigmatized Knowledge & Suppressed Discourses, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.65655/pe2j7b54
Sangwa, S. (2026). The stages of World War III as narrative policy: Computational mapping of conspiracy discourse and biblical prophecy. Open Journal of Stigmatized Knowledge & Suppressed Discourses, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.65655/ynayd346
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. (2025). Trends in world military expenditure, 2024. https://www.sipri.org/publications/2025/sipri-fact-sheets/trends-world-military-expenditure-2024
UNESCO. (2025, October 1). Deepfakes and the crisis of knowing. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/deepfakes-and-crisis-knowing
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2025, June 12). Global trends: Forced displacement in 2024. https://www.unhcr.org/global-trends
van Prooijen, J.-W., & Douglas, K. M. (2017). Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies, 10(3), 323-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017701615
Ward, C., & Voas, D. (2011). The emergence of conspirituality. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 26(1), 103-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2011.539846
World Economic Forum. (2025). The global risks report 2025 (20th ed.). https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2025/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sixbert SANGWA (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.