Misinformation Laws and Free Speech: Biblical Theology and Constitutional Principles for Global Social Media Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65655/0nwajh64Keywords:
social media regulation, misinformation policy, biblical public theology, freedom of expression, constitutional law, platform governance, digital literacyAbstract
Background: Governments and major platforms increasingly portray online discourse as a “misinformation” crisis, justifying far-reaching controls that risk eroding free expression rooted in scriptural and constitutional principles. Purpose: The article develops a biblically grounded, constitutionally coherent framework that protects truthful speech while restraining coercive uses of the misinformation label. Design/methodology/approach: Using mixed-methods secondary research, the study integrates three analytical lenses—agenda-setting and propaganda theory, the political economy of platform regulation, and Christian public theology (imago Dei, sphere sovereignty, subsidiarity). It triangulates doctrinal legal analysis, a systematic scoping review (2015–2025), documentary scrutiny of United Nations and platform policies, a cross-jurisdictional policy matrix, and computational discourse analysis. Findings: Regulatory trends align with global governance agendas, foster state–platform collusion, and frequently misclassify dissenting yet factual claims as “misinformation.” The proposed framework shows that upholding truthful speech, mandating radical transparency, decentralising content moderation, and investing in digital literacy better curb harms without enabling authoritarian control. Implications: An accompanying impact matrix equips lawmakers, platforms, and civil society to test legislation and moderation rules against constitutional free-speech guarantees and the biblical conviction that humans created in the imago Dei (Genesis 1:27) are called to seek and speak truth. Originality/value: By uniting media theory, legal scholarship, and Christian ethics, this study offers the first interdisciplinary blueprint that both diagnoses the power dynamics behind misinformation policy and sets out actionable, faith-informed remedies for a resilient digital public square.
References
Aggarwal, V. K. (2024). Platform power and regulatory capture in digital governance. Business and Politics, 27(2), 284-308. https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2024.33
Altoe, F., Moreira, C., Pinto, H. S., & Jorge, J. A. (2024). Online fake news opinion spread and belief change: A systematic review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2024, Article 1069670. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1069670
American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP). (2023). Policy statement on the impact of social media on youth mental health. https://www.aacap.org/AACAP/Policy_Statements/2023/Social_Media_Youth_Mental_Health.aspx.
Ashraf, M. M. (2024, December 16). UN global principles on information integrity: A missed opportunity. Bot Populi. https://botpopuli.net/un-global-principles-on-information-integrity-a-missed-opportunity/
Billingham, P. (2024). Subsidiarity, sphere sovereignty, and state sovereignty. European Journal of Political Theory. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14748851241269585
Caesmann, M., Goldzycher, J., Grigoletto, M., & Gschwent, L. (2024). Censorship to defend democracy. CEPR VoxEU. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/censorship-defend-democracy
Catholic News Service (CNS). (2021, August 20). Faith leaders raise concerns over online censorship of religious speech. National Catholic Reporter. https://www.ncronline.org/news/theology/faith-leaders-raise-concerns-over-online-censorship-religious-speech.
Chhabra, J., Pilkington, V., Benakovic, R., Wilson, M. J., La Sala, L., & Seidler, Z. (2025). Social Media and Youth Mental Health: Scoping Review of Platform and Policy Recommendations. Journal of medical Internet research, 27, e72061. https://doi.org/10.2196/72061
Cieslikowski, J. (2022, December 22). Half of Americans want social media companies to remove ‘misinformation’ and ‘hate’. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression. https://www.thefire.org/news/half-americans-want-social-media-companies-remove-misinformation-and-hate
Douek, E. (2022). Content moderation as systems thinking. Harvard Law Review, 136(2), 526–606. https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/136-Harv.-L.-Rev.-526.pdf
Engler, P. (2023, January 25). God’s image as the foundation for human rights. Answers in Genesis. https://answersingenesis.org/sanctity-of-life/gods-image-as-the-foundation-for-human-rights/
Funk, A., Shahbaz, A., & Vesteinsson, K. (2023). The repressive power of artificial intelligence. In Freedom on the Net 2023 (pp. 1–35). Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/2023/repressive-power-artificial-intelligence
Haack, S. M. (2012). Christian explorations in the concept of human dignity. Dignitas, 19(3), 4–7, 10–13. https://www.cbhd.org/dignitas-articles/christian-explorations-in-the-concept-of-human-dignity
Hasinoff, A. A., & Schneider, N. (2022). From Scalability to Subsidiarity in Addressing Online Harm. Social Media + Society, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221126041 (Original work published 2022)
House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis (HSSCC). (2021, December 17). Email correspondence between Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci regarding the Great Barrington Declaration [FOIA release]. https://coronavirus.house.gov/sites/democrats.coronavirus.house.gov/files/2020.10.13%20FOIA-00001024.pdf
Jacobs, L. G. (2022, June 2). Freedom of speech and regulation of fake news. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 70(Supplement 1), i278–i311. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avac010
Justitia, Vanderbilt University, & Aarhus University. (2023). The free speech recession hits home: Mapping laws and regulations affecting free speech in 22 open democracies. Future of Free Speech Project. https://futurefreespeech.com/the-free-speech-recession-hits-home/
Kausche, K., & Weiss, M. (2025). Platform power and regulatory capture in digital governance. Business and Politics, 27(2), 284–308. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2024.33
Kozyreva, A., Herzog, S. M., Lewandowsky, S., Hertwig, R., Lorenz-Spreen, P., Leiser, M., & Reifler, J. (2023). Resolving content moderation dilemmas between free speech and harmful misinformation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120(7), e2210666120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2210666120
Lim, G., & Bradshaw, S. (2023). Chilling legislation: Tracking the impact of “fake news” laws on press freedom internationally. Center for International Media Assistance. https://www.cima.ned.org/publication/chilling-legislation/
Littlejohn, B. (2021, April 16). A theology of free speech. The Gospel Coalition. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/theology-free-speech/
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
Mitchell, D. (2020). What does Christianity have to do with freedom of speech? Solas CPC. https://www.solas-cpc.org/what-does-christianity-have-to-do-with-freedom-of-speech/
Office of the Surgeon General (OSG). (2021). Confronting health misinformation: The U.S. Surgeon General’s advisory on building a healthy information environment. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/surgeon-general-misinformation-advisory.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023, February 20). Media literacy education system: Finland [Case study]. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2023/02/mis-and-disinformation_c584ff91/media-literacy-education-system_28535133.html
Peterson-Salahuddin, C. (2024). Repairing the harm: Toward an algorithmic reparations approach to hate speech content moderation. Big Data & Society, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241245333 (Original work published 2024)
Pew Research Center. (2025, August 19). Widespread global public concerns about false information online. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2025/08/19/widespread-global-public-concerns-about-false-information-online/
Pew Research Center. (2025, April 24). Importance of press freedom, free speech, and freedom on the internet. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2025/04/24/importance-of-press-freedom-free-speech-and-freedom-on-the-internet/
Pozen, D. (2022, February 9). “Truth drives out lies” and other misinformation. Knight First Amendment Institute. https://knightcolumbia.org/blog/truth-drives-out-lies-and-other-misinformation
Robertson, K., & Williams, A. (2024). Mass media – agenda-setting theory and the propaganda model. In Insights into Communication Studies: Understanding Foundational Theories for Media Literacy. Open Educational Alberta. https://pressbooks.openeducationalberta.ca/insightsintocommstudies/chapter/chapter-8-mass-media/
Sangwa, S. and Mutabazi, P. (2025), Lucifer's Operating System: Exposing the Spiritual Code of Global Governance. Open Journal of Business Theology , Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5344142
Sangwa, S. and Mutabazi, P. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Ethics and Biblical Prophecy: A Global Christian Analysis of Algorithmic Censorship, Digital Deception, and Eschatological Risk. Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5283976
Sangwa, Sixbert and Mutabazi, Placide, Compliance as the New Competence: How Obedience Cultures Erode Innovation and Leadership Ethics in Global Workplaces (July 29, 2025). Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5371035
Sangwa S. (2025). UN Pact for the Future and Global Digital Compact: A Critical Interdisciplinary Analysis of Global Digital Governance, Digital-ID, and Central-Bank Digital Currencies. Open Journal of Stigmatized Knowledge & Suppressed Discourses (OJ-SKSD). Vol 01. Issue 01. Open Christian Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16983508
Santos, N. (2024, March 4). Why do we need to discuss so-called “information integrity”? TechPolicy.Press. https://www.techpolicy.press/why-do-we-need-to-discuss-socalled-information-integrity/
Schaefer, B. (2024, September 16). The U.S. must oppose the U.N. pact for the future. The Heritage Foundation. https://www.heritage.org/node/25157583/print-display
Sullum, J. (2023). Under Government Pressure, Twitter Suppressed Truthful Speech About COVID-19. https://reason.com/2023/01/02/under-government-pressure-twitter-suppressed-truthful-speech-about-covid-19/
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office of the Surgeon General. (2023, May 23). Social media and youth mental health: The U.S. Surgeon General’s advisory. https://www.hhs.gov/surgeongeneral/reports-and-publications/youth-mental-health/social-media/index.html
WACC Global. (2019, August 12). From manufacturing consent to manufacturing consensus. https://waccglobal.org/from-manufacturing-consent-to-manufacturing-consensus/
Walker, A. T. (2024, September 4). Why free speech should be a Christian priority. WORLD. https://wng.org/opinions/why-free-speech-should-be-a-christian-priority-1725445940
Wikipedia contributors. (2025, October 2). Sphere sovereignty. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sphere_sovereignty
Zweig, D. (2023, January 3). What the Twitter Files reveal about COVID-19 truths. The Free Press. https://www.thefp.com/p/twitter-files-covid-truths
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sixbert SANGWA, Placide Mutabazi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
