Boundary Confusion in AI-Assisted Relationships Among Young Adults in Universities

Authors

  • Dr. Alphonse NKURUNZIZA Wellness Center, Student Life, African Leadership University Author
  • Prof. Sixbert SANGWA, PhD Department of International Business and Trade, African Leadership University Author
  • Father Prof. Fidèle DUSHIMIMANA, PhD Institut Catholique de Kabgayi Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65655/ocp.2026.0080

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence; AI-assisted communication; boundary confusion; attachment styles; romantic relationships; university students.

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into everyday communication, extending beyond functional and academic uses to influence romantic relationships, particularly among university students who are deeply immersed in digital technologies. As AI systems become more emotionally responsive and easily accessible, they play an increasingly significant role in intimate interactions, raising important questions about their psychological and relational consequences.

Purpose: This study aims to quantitatively examine the relationship between AI-assisted relationship communication and boundary confusion among university students, addressing a critical gap in the existing literature on artificial intelligence and intimate relationships.

Methods: This quantitative cross-sectional study involved 420 university students (210 females, 210 males) currently engaged in romantic relationships. Participants completed standardized questionnaires measuring AI-Assisted Relationship Communication (AIRCS), Boundary Confusion in AI-Assisted Relationships (BCARS), and attachment anxiety and avoidance using the Experiences in Close Relationships–Revised (ECR-R). Data were analyzed using SPSS 29.0 and AMOS 29.0, applying correlation, regression, and structural equation modeling analyses.

Results: AI-assisted relationship communication was strongly associated with boundary confusion and emerged as its strongest predictor. Attachment anxiety and avoidance also significantly predicted both AI-assisted communication and boundary confusion.

Conclusion: The results show that students who frequently use AI for emotional support and relationship communication are more likely to experience confusion about boundaries in their romantic relationships, especially those with insecure attachment styles. While AI can help meet emotional needs, it can also blur the line between human relationships and technology. These findings highlight the importance of teaching students how to use AI responsibly in relationships, developing clear ethical guidelines, and providing targeted support through university counseling services.

References

Alqurashi, T. S. (2025). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Intimate Partner Relationships. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2025.2591600

Al-Zahrani, A. M. (2025). Exploring the Impact of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots on Human Connection and Emotional Support Among Higher Education Students. Sage Open, 15(2), 21582440251340615. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251340615

Arghode, V., & Nafukho, F. M. (2025). Emotionally intelligent and ethically grounded AI: Reimagining learning and development in the digital age. European Journal of Training and Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-04-2025-0072

Babu, J., Joseph, D., Kumar, R. M., Alexander, E., Sasi, R., & Joseph, J. (2025). Emotional AI and the rise of pseudo-intimacy: Are we trading authenticity for algorithmic affection? Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1679324. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1679324

Brunswicker, S., Zhang, Y., Rashidian, C., & Linna, D. W. (2025). Trust through words: The systemize-empathize-effect of language in task-oriented conversational agents. Computers in Human Behavior, 165, 108516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108516

Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511

Heng, S., & Zhang, Z. (2025). Attachment Anxiety and Problematic Use of Conversational Artificial Intelligence: Mediation of Emotional Attachment and Moderation of Anthropomorphic Tendencies. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, Volume 18, 1775–1785. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S531805

Kirk, H. R., Gabriel, I., Summerfield, C., Vidgen, B., & Hale, S. A. (2025). Why human–AI relationships need socioaffective alignment. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 728. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04532-5

Klimova, B., & Pikhart, M. (2025). Exploring the effects of artificial intelligence on student and academic well-being in higher education: A mini-review. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1498132. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1498132

Malfacini, K. (2025). The impacts of companion AI on human relationships: Risks, benefits, and design considerations. AI & SOCIETY, 40(7), 5527–5540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02318-6

Nkurunziza, A., & Munganyinka, C. (2024). Exploring the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology on communication, intimacy, and relationship satisfaction among married couples. International Journal of Home Science, 10(3), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.22271/23957476.2024.v10.i3c.1686

Stark, L., & Hoey, J. (2021). The Ethics of Emotion in Artificial Intelligence Systems. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 782–793. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445939

Suriá-Martínez, R., García-Castillo, F., López-Sánchez, C., & García Del Castillo, J. A. (2025). Emotional Profiles and Their Relationship with the Use of Artificial Intelligence in University Students. Behavioral Sciences, 15(11), 1573. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15111573

Tan, K., Jarnecke, A. M., & South, S. C. (2023). Social anhedonia, communication, and marital satisfaction in newlywed couples. Journal of Personality, 91(5), 1239–1252. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12798

Wang, L. H., Rice, R. E., Liu, X., Hagen, I., & Zamanzadeh, N. (2025). Mastering boundaries: Differences in online privacy boundary phenomena across digital devices and years. Behaviour & Information Technology, 44(15), 3750–3770. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2448706

Willoughby, B. J., Dover, C. R., Hakala, R. M., & Carroll, J. S. (2025). Artificial connections: Romantic relationship engagement with artificial intelligence in the United States. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 42(12), 3363–3387. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075251371394

Wu, Q., Chi, P., Lin, X., Du, H., Zhou, N., Cao, H., & Liang, Y. (2022). Gratitude and satisfaction in romantic relationships: Roles of decisional forgiveness and emotional forgiveness. Current Psychology, 41(5), 2668–2676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00780-7

Yang, F., & Oshio, A. (2025). Using attachment theory to conceptualize and measure the experiences in human-AI relationships. Current Psychology, 44(11), 10658–10669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07917-6

Downloads

Published

2026-02-05

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

NKURUNZIZA, A., SANGWA, S., & DUSHIMIMANA, . F. . (2026). Boundary Confusion in AI-Assisted Relationships Among Young Adults in Universities. Open Journal of AI, Ethics & Society (ISSN: 3105-3076), 2(1). https://doi.org/10.65655/ocp.2026.0080

Most read articles by the same author(s)